|
Some Reflections On The Lateral Hiring MarketEvery year, professors move from lower-ranked institutions to higher-ranked institutions. But for the lateral market to sustain itself, schools have to continue to play the game: recruit laterals, hoping they improve the school's standing before they move onto greener pastures. One way to measure this market is to analyze the track record of a new school that built its faculty from scratch. Over the past quarter century, the American Bar Association has granted provisional accreditation to about 20 law schools. Only three of those institutions have cracked the top 100 U.S. News rankings. Last year, FIU was at #77 and Drexel was at #82. U.C. Irvine, founded in 2007, is the outlier. The new state school has hovered between #20 and #40 over the past decade. A lot of the credit should go to Founding Dean Erwin Chemerinsky. But even after Chemerinsky departed for Berkeley in 2017, the rankings have stayed fairly consistent. Starting from a blank slate, Irvine was able to build a faculty from the ground up, using both entry-level hires as well as laterals. I thought it might be worthwhile to analyze lateral hires and departures from Irvine over the past two decades. Here, I owe a debt to Brian Leiter and Dan Filler, who have charted these moves since 2006. Many of the posts on the Faculty Lounge, Concurring Opinions, and Leiter Reports can now be found on the Internet Archive. I include the raw results below the jump. Here, I will offer some broader observations about the lateral hiring market. I don't think these patterns are limited to Irvine, but that institution is a useful measuring stick because it started so recently. All of my counts here are tentative. Please let me know if there are any errors. By my count, between 2008 and 2026, at Irvine there were a total of about 40 lateral hires (including two deans). Between 2008 and 2026, sixteen of these forty lateral hires later departed. Here, I will note the year they were hired and the year they departed.
In most of these moves, the professor transferred to a higher-ranked school. The average duration of a lateral hire who departed was about six years. I exclude in this count two professors (L. Song Richardson and Mario Barnes) who departed for administrative positions, but then returned to Irvine. I also exclude Katie Porter who left teaching to serve in the House, but then returned to the faculty. Those aren't exactly laterals in the traditional sense of the term. At least four of the lateral hires seem to have taken emeritus status: Bryant Garth, Kaaryn Gustafson, Robert Solomon, and Grace Tonner. As best as I can tell, sixteen recruited laterals are still teaching in a full-time status at Irvine: Christopher Leslie, Tony Reese, Mario Barnes, Katherine Porter, Sameer Ashar, Kenneth W. Simons, Victor Fleischer, Ji Li, Austen Parrish (Dean), Veena Dubal, Kevin Haeberle, Ari Waldman, Robert S. Chang, Andrew Gold, Trevor G. Reed, and Charles Tyler. If my math is right, out of a total of forty laterals, twenty-four remained and sixteen departed. The departure rate of hired laterals is about 40%. Or, you might say the retention rate is 60%, but that number is harder to rely on because some professors took emeritus status or retired, so were not really on the move. Moreover, based on my count, there are four professors that Irvine hired on the entry-level market who lateraled out of Irvine: Alejandro Camacho (UCLA), Seth Davis (Berkeley), Jonathan Glater (Berkeley), and Leah Litman (Michigan). If you factor in these departures, the retention rate is even lower. In an ideal world, the number of lateral hires should far exceed the number of lateral departures. Schools that recruit scholars should be able to retain them. But the world is far from ideal. Professors who lateral to one school will often be recruited elsewhere. Indeed, I think it is a positive that a school recruits and develops scholars who go onto other institutions. More realistically, the number of lateral hires should roughly match the number of lateral departures to keep the faculty at parity: for every lateral that departs another lateral should be hired. At least at Irvine, the number of lateral hires that remained is fairly close to the number of lateral hires that depart. I don't know how Irvine's retention rate compares to other schools. This is something I might compute in the future. Still, with all of those caveats, to keep a law school's reputation at parity, the rate of lateral departures needs to approximate the rate of lateral hires. If more scholars depart, and cannot be replaced, a school's standing might drop. Indeed, the public might wonder why so many scholars are heading for the door. One might reply that new scholars can be recruited through entry-level hiring. The entry-level market can be unpredictable, and junior scholars can take many years to develop. And again, those entry-level hires who make a name for themselves are likely to be recruited by a higher-ranked institution. It's hard to keep home-grown talent, unless the school either pays up, or the professor has some personal reason to stay. Another premise is that laterals are expensive. It often takes a lot of money to persuade a professor to move their family from a place they built a strong reputation. Very often professors will sign a retention bonus to promise they will stay at a new law school for a few years. But once those contractual terms lapse, the professor can move up to another school that will pay a greater sum. This happens all the time. I welcome comments, feedback, and corrections. ***
The post Some Reflections On The Lateral Hiring Market appeared first on Reason Magazine. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Our Privacy Policy can be viewed at https://freeinternetpress.com/privacy_policy.php FIP XML/RSS/RDF Newsfeed Syndication https://freeinternetpress.com/rss.php © 2026 FreeInternetPress.com Free Internet Press is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. You may reuse or distribute original works on this site, with attribution per the above license. Any mirrored or quoted materials may be copyright their respective authors, publications, or outlets, as shown on their publication, indicated by the link in the news story. Such works are used under the fair use doctrine of United States copyright law. Should any materials be found overused or objectionable to the copyright holder, notification should be sent to [email protected], and the work will be removed and replaced with such notification. Please email [email protected] with any questions. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||