|
How Do You Define 'Ceasefire'?![]() Iran said Lebanon had to be included if anyone wanted any hope of a U.S.-Iran ceasefire, so Israel and Lebanon agreed to a ceasefire. But Hezbollah—which acts independently of the Lebanese government and is not entwined with it the way Hamas is with the governance of Palestine—did not agree to it, and fired on Israel. So Israel retaliated, and now we're right back where we started. So President Donald Trump's comments yesterday weren't wrong, exactly:
In fact, one could make the case he's rather prescient. "URGENT WARNING TO RESIDENTS OF SOUTH LEBANON!" posted Avichay Adraee, an Israeli military spokesman, on social media. "The fighting in southern Lebanon continues as the Israel Defense Forces continue to target Hezbollah facilities and infrastructure located in your villages and nearby. The Israel Defense Forces do not intend to harm you. To ensure your safety, refrain from heading south of the Zahrani River until further notice!" All of this raises the question of why it was valuable for Israel and Lebanon to agree to a ceasefire when Hezbollah is the relevant entity. The ceasefire agreement calls for the creation of "pilot zones" where the Lebanese military would "take exclusive control" over "nonstate actors" (meaning Hezbollah). The question is how enforceable that really is. Meanwhile, Trump said yesterday that the war in Iran was "not a big thing" for the U.S. "We have the highest stock market in history with a military conflict going on, or a war—some people call it war, some people call it a military—it's not a big thing for us," said the president. "We have a great military. It's not a big thing for us." What Trump says publicly, and what he actually cares about pursuing, are frequently different (like all presidents). He still seems oriented toward hammering out a ceasefire with Iran, but sticking points—like removing enriched uranium from Iran's territory, so that its nuclear program further stalls—remain. Furthermore, the war in Iran does in fact appear to be a big thing for one important contingent: the U.S. House of Representatives. Yesterday, they voted to have the president withdraw the U.S. military from conflict with Iran or gain congressional approval to continue, with four Republicans defecting from their own party to vote with Democrats. Now, the war powers resolution goes to the Senate, though it's not totally clear how Trump will play this if it passes there. He's repeatedly cast doubt on the constitutionality of the War Powers Act, but simultaneously does seem interested in winding down the conflict in Iran. It's possible he gets belligerent, or it's possible he uses congressional pressure as an excuse to do a thing he already wanted to do: pursue a ceasefire. Scenes from New York: The Knicks won! This is now a Knicks-in-six zone. (I think four might be tough for them to swing.)
QUICK HITS
The post How Do You Define 'Ceasefire'? appeared first on Reason.com. |
|
Our Privacy Policy can be viewed at https://freeinternetpress.com/privacy_policy.php FIP XML/RSS/RDF Newsfeed Syndication https://freeinternetpress.com/rss.php © 2026 FreeInternetPress.com Free Internet Press is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. You may reuse or distribute original works on this site, with attribution per the above license. Any mirrored or quoted materials may be copyright their respective authors, publications, or outlets, as shown on their publication, indicated by the link in the news story. Such works are used under the fair use doctrine of United States copyright law. Should any materials be found overused or objectionable to the copyright holder, notification should be sent to [email protected], and the work will be removed and replaced with such notification. Please email [email protected] with any questions. |
|