Mobile Version
Free Internet Press
  Uncensored News For Real People

FIP Year In Review

FIP Month in Review

FIP Archive Search

Multiple Discoveries from NASA's New Horizons Pluto Mission

R.I.P. William 'Bill' Herbert Kelder - Intellpuke

Gamers Donate 37,500 Pounds Of Food To Needy

Statement From The Whitehouse Regarding The Government Shutdown

An Open Response To 'Organizing for Action'

Bayou Corne: The Biggest Ongoing Disaster In The U.S. You Have Not Heard Of

Boston Mayor Hopes Feds 'Throw the Book' at Marathon Bombing Suspect

Boston Police Closing In On Suspects

2 Explosions At Boston Marathon. 2 Dead, Many Injured.

The Press vs Citizens Rights and Privacy - Act 3

CBS News - Year In Review 2012 - 366 Days: 2012 In Review

The Guardian - 2012 In Review: An Interactive Guide To The Year That Was

TruTV - The Biggest Conspiracy Theories of 2012

Colbert Nation: 2012: A Look Back

FIP Year In Review(s?)

Happy Holidays

Welcome To A New Era!

An Open Letter To United Health Care, Medcom, And The Medical Insurance Industry In General

Whitehouse Petition To Remove "Under God" and "In God" From Currency And The Pledge.

December 21, 2012

If Hillary Clinton Ran For President, She Would Probably Be The Best-prepared Candidate In American History

CIA Director David Petraeus Resigns After FBI Investigation Uncovers Affair With High-Profile Journalist

FIP Format Update

Thank you for voting.

Live Election Results

FIP In Hiatus

U.S.-Afghan Military Operations Suspended After Attacks

Iran Nuclear Chief Says IAEA Might Be Infiltrated By 'Terrorists And Saboteurs'

Romney Stands By Gaffe

Commentary: Putin Restricts Protests With 'Scandalous' New Law
2012-06-07 13:47:58 (220 weeks ago)
Posted By: Intellpuke
Intellpuke: The following commentary was written by Spiegel journalist David Gordon Smith, writing under the German news magazine's column "The World from Berlin", which includes editorial comments by various German news organizations. Mr. Smith's column, and the commentaries, were posted on Spiegel Online's edition for Thursday, June 7, 2012.

The Russian parliament has passed a new law curtailing the right to protest, which is expected to enter into force before major demonstrations planned for next week. German commentators condemn the attack on civil rights.

Vladimir Putin has barely been back in office as Russian president for four weeks, but he is already flexing his muscles.

This week, the Russian parliament approved a controversial bill which will significantly restrict the right to demonstrate. Under the new law, individuals who take part in unauthorized protests could face maximum penalties of 300,000 rubles (€7,400 or $9,300) or 200 hours of community service, while organizations could face fines of up to 1 million rubles. The fines are a massive increase over the previous penalties.

The State Duma, the lower house of the Russian parliament, approved the bill on Tuesday and was passed in the upper house on Wednesday. In an uncharacteristic sign of defiance, normally docile opposition parties in the State Duma proposed hundreds of amendments to the bill in an attempt to slow down its passage, but the pro-Kremlin United Russia party used its majority to vote down the amendments and approve the bill.

Putin is expected to sign the bill into law by next Tuesday, a public holiday when the opposition plans to hold a major demonstration in Moscow. Critics accused United Russia of curtailing freedoms. One Communist Party politician told the Associated Press that the law would "destroy the social peace and deepen the divide in the society."

The law may have an unintended effect, though. Some observers predicted that it will actually encourage more people to take to the streets, outraged at the attack on their rights.

(story continues below)

The bill is a reaction to a series of huge anti-government protests in Russia following December's parliamentary elections, which the opposition claims were rigged. Putin recently spoke out in favor of the new law, saying: "We must shield our people from radical actions."

German commentators take a look at the new law.

The left-leaning daily Berliner Zeitung writes:

"This week, the Duma woke up from its deep sleep. The unbelievable happened -- unbelievable, at least, for Russia. The docile parliamentary opposition fought bitterly against the restrictions to demonstration rights. Representatives staged open rebellion, flooding the agenda with hundreds of amendments and stretching the debate until deep into the night. It was a rearguard action -- their defeat was predictable and some of the methods used were dubious. But it was a lively battle."

"The fact that parliament has now been awakened makes sense. With the scandalous new law, the Kremlin is trying to stem the most recent wave of protests. Not just demonstrations, but any gathering of people can now be punished with draconian penalties. But by fighting the protests on the street, the Kremlin has brought it into the parliament. Instead of silencing his opponents, Putin has now given them a stage."

The center-left daily Der Tagesspiegel writes:

"Who will still have the courage to oppose Putin on the streets when threatened with financial ruin? The new law is an answer to the large-scale demonstrations that Russia has seen since the parliamentary election in 2011. It is also an expression of the state power's absolute helplessness, because ultimately it shows the fear Russia's leaders have of their own fellow citizens."

"Instead of reacting to the protest movement and ushering in more democracy, Putin is leading his country in the opposite direction. Nothing good can be expected to come from his next four years in office."

In an editorial published in its Wednesday edition, the conservative Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung writes:

"The restriction of the right to demonstrate by the Russian parliament represents the essence of Vladimir Putin's rule: the arbitary exercising of power, cloaked in a pretense of legality. While media loyal to the regime have praised, as a sign of liberalism, the fact that the maxium penalties in the original bill were significantly reduced during the law's passage through the parliamentary consultation process, a host of clauses were written into the law which de facto abolish the right to demonstrate."

"It was already the case in the past that the right to demonstrate existed more in theory than in practice, but even that was apparently too dangerous for Putin, after he was forced to witness, in the months before his re-election, just how quickly theory can turn into practice."

Intellpuke: You can read this commentary by Spiegel journalist David Gordon Smith, and the commentaries, in context here:

Email To A Friend
Email this story to a friend:
Your Name:
Their Email:
Readers Comments
Add your own comment.
(Anonymous commenting now enabled.)

Creative Commons License
Free Internet Press is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. You may reuse or distribute original works on this site, with attribution per the above license.

Any mirrored or quoted materials may be copyright their respective authors, publications, or outlets, as shown on their publication, indicated by the link in the news story. Such works are used under the fair use doctrine of United States copyright law. Should any materials be found overused or objectionable to the copyright holder, notification should be sent to, and the work will be removed and replaced with such notification.

Please email with any questions.

Our Privacy Policy can be viewed at

XML/RSS/RDF Newsfeed Syndication XML/RSS/RDF Newsfeed Syndication:

XML/RSS/RDF Newsfeed Syndication XML News Sitemap