Background: The European Parliament overwhelmingly approved the new European
Commission on Tuesday. Members of the European Parliament voted 488 to
137 in favor of the 26-person team put forward by Commission President
Jose Manuel Barroso. The approval was expected after Barroso replaced
one of his original nominees, Bulgaria's Rumiana Jeleva, following
opposition from the parliament and clears the way for the Commission to
take office more than three months behind schedule. Its five-year
mandate will formally begin at midnight on Tuesday. The European
Commission is the E.U.'s executive arm and is responsible for drafting
and enforcing laws in the 27-member bloc.
Former European Commissioner Gunter Verheugen,
whose 10 years in office ended Tuesday, talks to Spiegel Online about
E.U.-U.S. relations, the prospect of a common E.U. military and the union's
lack of vision.
SPIEGEL ONLINE: The new European Commission was approved
Tuesday, thereby ending your 10 years as a commissioner in Brussels. Is
the E.U. still an alliance of nations on the way to an ever-closer union,
or is it just a bigger club with the same old problems?
Gunter Verheugen: With the 27 members that it has today,
compared to the 15 that it had back then, the E.U. has obviously changed
dramatically. We have achieved much in those 10 years, but a few
fundamental questions remain open: There seems to be no vision within
the Union of where we are heading. There is no consensus over where the
borders of the E.U. should lie in the future, and there is no consensus
over how we should define our role in the world.
SPIEGEL ONLINE: Is it not too late for that already? Barack Obama recently canceled his participation in the upcoming E.U.-U.S. summit. Has our continent become unimportant to the Americans?
Verheugen: No. The overwhelming strategic importance of the
trans-Atlantic relationship won't change. The Americans expect more
participation in global affairs from our side, but we are not ready for
that. We want to be taken seriously by the Americans as partners,
therefore we should first develop our ability to be partners.
SPIEGEL ONLINE: In the public perception, you and your
colleagues represent the whole E.U. apparatus, which is held in
increasing disdain. Why is the Commission viewed as the epitome of
bureaucratic hell?
Verheugen: That isn't fair. The Commission is the motor and
powerhouse of European integration. But I concede that the image of the
Commission is still too strongly influenced by the idea that it is some
kind of many-tentacled bureaucratic monster that wants to regulate and
harmonize more and more areas of people's lives.
SPIEGEL ONLINE: But there are good reasons for that impression.
Verheugen: To me, achieving a cultural shift in the institutions
of the European Union has been of the highest importance over the last
few years. I have tried to get away from the mentality that the
European project can only be achieved through more and more rules. That
said, whatever we communicate has to go through the twin filters of the
national media and national politics. In many countries, especially in
Germany, the bad habit has developed of always putting the blame for
anything unpleasant on "those people in Brussels". A lot of what we do
is very technical, the language is horribly overblown and bureaucratic
through and through. It's something that is difficult for people to
understand.
SPIEGEL ONLINE: Is that resignation in the face of a
self-created monster? You have complained often enough that is hard to
get anything done with all the bureaucracy.
|