Intellpuke: The following commentary was written by Philip S.
Golub and appears in the Le Monde diplomatique English-language edition
for October 2007. Mr. Golub is a journalist and lecturer at the
University of Paris VIII. His commentary follows:
The Bush administration is a case study in how a small elite
representing minority interests can seize power and then use fear and
nationalism in a political mobilisation to achieve authoritarian goals.
When he came to power in 2000 Bush had no democratic legitimacy. He had
lost the popular vote to Al Gore and had been given the presidency by a
questionable Supreme Court decision to stop a vote recount in Florida.
For manyconstitutional scholars, the Bush victory amounted to a
“constitutional coup, an unlawful accession to power”.
Although Al Gore conceded to Bush to avoid a constitutional crisis,
the presidency was tainted by illegitimacy. Given the balance of forces
- the Republicans lost control of the Senate in July 2001 - many
analysts expected political paralysis, hence a modest presidency in
domestic and international policy.
The opposite happened. From the start the Bush White House strove to
remove constraints on its sovereign action. In the domestic sphere,
rather than governing from the center as expected, it engaged in
adversarial politics designed to polarise society, and launched a
sustained effort to reduce the rights secured by women and minorities
during the 1960s and 1970s. Karl Rove, Bush’s political adviser who has
now resigned, invented this strategy to mobilise and unify
conservatives, fracture the Democrats and create a permanent Republican
majority.
|